Detection and management of pornography-seeking in an online clinical dermatology atlas. | Discoblog

![computer][1]”BACKGROUND: Increased use of an online educational archive of photographic dermatology case materials (DermAtlas) indicated unexpected pornography-seeking behavior and misuse.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the extent of archive misuse.

METHODS: Web usage/request patterns were examined over a 6-month period for requests by anatomic site, diagnosis, and age group plus anatomic site. Free-text queries and referrals from external Web sites were reviewed.

RESULTS: Of 7800 images, 5.5% contain genital sites. Of all requests, 11% were for anatomic sites (37% genital sites); 62% were specified for diagnoses (12% genital sites). When age group and anatomic site were specified, the relative risk of a child being requested (vs adult) was 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.44-1.53). Of 10000 free text queries, 12% retrieved images containing genital sites. Of all referrals, 14.3% originated from nonmedical (pornography/fetish) Web sites.

LIMITATIONS: Requests are mixed with legitimate queries.

CONCLUSION: Online photographic dermatology archives are vulnerable to misuse. Monitoring and intervention are necessary to preserve their availability and integrity.”


_Photo: flickr/[Johan.V.][4] _ Related content: Discoblog: [NCBI ROFL: How extraverted is Inferring personality from e-mail addresses.][5] Discoblog: [NCBI ROFL: Writing emails as part of sleepwalking after increase in Zolpidem [Ambien].][6] Discoblog: [NCBI ROFL: Salvia divinorum: the pot of the future (at least according to YouTube).][7]

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our [FAQ][8]!

[![][9]][10] [![][11]][12]


[1]:×200.jpg (computer) [2]: (dermatology) [3]: [4]: [5]: [6]: [7]: [8]: [9]: [10]: [11]: [12]: [13]:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *